Archive for category Uncategorized

Who foresees the future better—the Hedgehog or the Fox?

“The fox knows many things, but the hedgehog knows one big thing.”

–  Archilochus

In the June 3rd issue of Chemical & Engineering News Frederick M. Peterson, a chemical engineer who went on to achieve a doctorate in economics, dissects what happens when “Scientists Tackle Finance.”  He warns against the tendency of experts in one field being overly bullish about their ability to manage things outside of their specialty.  These are the hedgehogs—people who make bold predictions and happen to be right long enough that they attract a strong following.

On the other hand, the foxes, who observe many things and adapt readily to differing situations, lack confidence about the chances of any particular path leading to success.  They are seen as being weak and wish-washy, which is not very popular.  Nevertheless, it may not be surprising that foxes do better than hedgehogs at forecasting, according to Peterson, who cites a seminal study by the School of Business at University of California, Berkeley.

The moral of this story is to be wary of anyone who expresses too much certainty about the shape of things to come.  It does not pay to follow hedgehogs—they will ultimately go beyond their narrow limits of competence and roll into something very prickly.

No Comments

Statistics provide a decisive advantage to taking one route to work versus another

Spring 2013 driving 35 vs 694 through N St PaulSee the results graphed on an experiment I just completed to decide whether to commute straight in to Minneapolis on Minnesota Highway 36 or take US Interstate 694 –a speedier, but longer, freeway bypass.  Notice that the least significant difference bars do not overlap,  thus providing more than 95 percent confidence that the scales tilt to one way (36) being faster–to put it simply.

For each run into work I randomly chose one route or the other based on a recipe sheet produced by Design-Expert software and timed it with a stopwatch app on my smart phone.     Then I entered the results in the software and it gave me the answer I wanted.

It appears that I can save the better part of a minute by not shooting around on 694.  That is good to know!

2 Comments

George Box–a giant in the field of industrial design of experiments (DOE)

George Box passed away this week at 94.  Having a rare combination of numerical and communication skills along with an abundance of common sense, this fellow made incredible contributions to the cause of industrial experimenters.  For more about George, see this wonderful tribute by John Hunter.

My memorable stories about Box both relate to his way with words that cut directly to a point:

  • In 1989 at the Annual Quality Congress in Toronto seeing him open his debate with competing guru Genichi Taguchi by throwing two words on an overhead projector–“Obscurity” and “Profundity”, and then after a dramatic pause, adding the not-equal sign between them.  This caused Taguchi’s son Shin to leap up from the front row and defend his father.  This cause the largest crowd I have ever seen at a technical conference to produce a collective gasp that one only rarely experiences.
  • In 1996 at a DOE workshop in Madison, Wisconsin enjoying his comeback to a very irritating disciple of Taguchi who kept interrupting the lecture: “If you are going to do something, you may as well do it right.”

Lest this give the impression that Box was mean-spirited see this well-reasoned white paper that provides a fair balance of praise and criticism of Taguchi, who created a huge push forward for the cause of planned experimentation for quality improvement.

The body of work by George Box in his field is monumental.  It provides the foundation for all that we do at Stat-Ease.  Thank you George, may you rest in peace!

No Comments

Minnesota the “1st Fastest Warming State” — Whoo hoo!

Check out this graphic by Climate Central. It shows Minnesota being the leader for winter warming from 1970 to 2012! Unfortunately, as usual, we do not do well when at the top and so a great deal of snow fell this winter and more is forecast for next week.

Given the equinox does not come until March 20 at 11:02 GMT, I remain hopeful for Spring. I am invested in warmer weather having bought tickets to opening day for the Minnesota Twins on April 1. Perhaps that was a bit foolish, but at least I will fit in with the theme for this day.  Also, I predict that our baseball team will make it to the playoffs.   Mark my words.

1 Comment

Only 14 percent of biomedical results are wrong, after all–Is this comforting?

The Scientist reports here that new mathematical studies refute previous findings that most current published medical research findings are false due to small study sizes and bias.   I suppose–considering the original assertion of “most” announced discoveries being wrong–we can literally live with a false positive rate of ‘only’ 14%  for findings that relate ultimately to our well being.    But the best advice is:

It is still important to report estimates and confidence intervals in addition to or instead of p-values when possible so that both statistical and scientific significance can be judged by readers.

– Leah R. Jager, Jeffrey T. Leek (“Empirical estimates suggest most published medical research is true”)

No Comments

This baby really did explode

I’ve been blessed with another grandson, my second, who arrived just before Thanksgiving.  I’ve become a bit gun-shy holding him due to his explosive colonic evacuations.  Today, though, I realized that being a babysitter could be a whole lot worse.  See what I mean by reading this New York Times obituary for nuclear scientist Donald Hornig.

In a small shed at the top of a 100-foot-tall steel tower deep in the New Mexico desert, Donald Hornig sat next to the world’s first atomic bomb in the late evening of July 15, 1945, reading a book of humorous essays. A storm raged, and he shuddered at each lightning flash.

No Comments

Hedonic adaptation-getting back to your happy place

While motoring down to a beach in southwest Florida 🙂 yesterday, I listened to this NPR interview of Sonja Lyubomirsky on her book “The Myths of Happiness”.  Evidently people have a natural ‘set point’—like a thermostat for mood—that helps them withstand terrible events and be happy again.  It’s called hedonic adaption.*  Sadly most folks suffer the flip side of this mood regulator: They finally get what they want, such as a coveted Christmas gift, but it does not make them any happier.

There is a nifty way around this—rather than gratifying your greed, do something for someone else.  It needn’t be much: Every little bit adds up to leading a happier life.

Such behavior is twice blest—good for the giver as well as the beneficiary.

“The pleasures associated with our own acts of consumption tend to be short-lived. The pleasures derived from doing something for others linger.”

– Excerpted from this 1/14/12 post on “Consumption Makes Us Sad? Science Says We Can Be Happy With Less” by Barry Schwartz of The Daily Beast.

*I dictated “hedonic adaptation blog” into my (supposedly) smart phone and it transcribed “add on a caterpillar engine block”—presumably thinking I meant to increase the horsepower in my road grader. Ha ha!

,

No Comments

Glass-shattering interaction of factors

Last week (12/21) the Today Show broadcasted an alarming demonstration of Pyrex glass exploding after being subjected to certain combinations of conditions.  See NBC News’ detailing here .  As reported in this American Ceramic Society Bulletin , some scientists believe that changes to the material (replacing borosilicate with soda lime silicate) weakened the glass.  However, makers of Pyrex disagree vehemently with these conclusions—see their side of the story here.

It turns out that hot Pyrex pans set directly on a wet or cool surface, such as a granite counter-top, undergo a sudden temperature change that produces some risk of it shattering.  That strikes close to home for me, having re-done our kitchen (as is the style nowadays) with granite.  Fortunately, being accustomed to plastic (Formica) countertops, I always put down cloth potholders before setting down the hot Pyrex pan.  The take-home message is being careful not to subject Pyrex to rapid increases or decreases in temperature.  See this site for safety instructions.

PS. On a lighter note (literally: too much sun) regarding heat and silica (main constituent of sand) see this New York Times news making it official that the hottest temperature ever recorded is 134 degrees F in Death Valley.  They are pyre Rex.

No Comments

Strange times: Ice forming in unlikely places and melting where it shouldn’t

My flight yesterday from Minneapolis to Santiago got held up for de-icing.  Being so near to the year-end solstice, the change in seasons from Minnesota to Chile could not be more dramatic—a swing of 45 degrees in solar angle relative to the ecliptic plan.  So it’s out of snow (storming today back home) and into 80+ degrees and pure sun. : )

Things are wackier than I’d thought in regard to where one might expect to find ice nowadays.  For example, who would have thought that water could freeze on Mercury?  But that’s what NASA recently reported based on a shout out from their spacecraft Messenger, which detected polar hydrogen via neutron spectroscopy.  See the details here.  I enjoyed the quip by Sean C. Solomon, the principal investigator for Messenger, about there being enough ice to encase Washington, D.C., in a frozen block two and a half miles deep.*  That might be what’s needed to cool down all the rhetoric about the fiscal cliff.  😉

Meanwhile the worries about the warming climate melting Earth’s icecaps just keep coming on.  Concerned about contrails contributing to the greenhouse effect, the Washington Post is now demanding the Santa’s sleigh be grounded.  Read this 12/4/12 blog and weep. : (

*On Closest Planet to the Sun, NASA Finds Lots of Ice, 11/29/12

No Comments

The amazing persistence of biased scientific results—Popeye’s spinach found fraudulent

I recently completed a series of webinars on using graphical diagnostics to deal with bad experimental data.*  The first thing I focused on was avoidance of confirmation bias – hearing what you want to hear, for example in the persistence of the possibilities of cold fusion.  See more cases of confirmation bias in this detailing by Peter Bowditch in Australasian Science.

I came across another interesting example of the persistence of wished-for results in a review** of Samuel Arbesman’s new book on The Half-Life of Facts.  It turns out that spinach really does not delivery the amount of iron that my mother always believed would make it worth us eating this horrible food.  She was a child of the 1930’s, at which time it was widely believed that the edible (?) plant contained 35 milligrams of iron, a tremendous concentration, per serving.  However, the actual value is 3.5 mg—the chemist who first analyzed it misplaced the decimal point when transcribing the data from his notebook in 1870!  In 1937 this error was finally corrected, but my mom never got the memo, unfortunately for me and my six younger siblings. ; )

*“Real-Life DOE” presentation, posted here

** The Scientific Blind Spot by David A. Shaywitz in the 11/19/12 issue of Wall Street Journal

No Comments